BDS/INS紧组合三频动对动模糊度解算方法
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 空军工程大学 信息与导航学院, 陕西 西安 710077;2. 中国人民解放军95140.部队, 广东 惠州 516211)

作者简介:

赵修斌(1965—),男,湖北天门人,教授,博士,博士生导师,E-mail:zhaoxiubin926@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P228.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(61601506)


Triple-frequency kinematic-to-kinematic ambiguity resolution with BDS/INS tightly-coupled integration
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Information and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi′an 710077, China;2. The PLA Unit 95140, Huizhou 516211, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对伪距观测噪声较大导致动对动条件下三频整周模糊度解法(Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolution, TCAR)模糊度解算不可靠的问题,提出了一种BDS/INS紧组合三频动对动整周模糊度解算方法。通过紧组合系统输出的高精度位置坐标,估算出双差几何距离值,并用其分别代替无几何和几何模式下的双差伪距观测值,显著降低了伪距双差观测噪声水平,有效提高了三频整周模糊度解算成功率。仿真实验结果表明,BDS/INS紧组合输出的高精度位置坐标使得伪距观测精度提高了60%以上,在短基线条件下,当伪距观测噪声达到2 m时,无几何模式下的TCAR算法模糊度解算成功率为0.73%,几何模式下的TCAR算法模糊度解算成功率为31.25%,而BDS/INS紧组合的TCAR算法在两种模式下的模糊度解算成功率达到99%以上,并且获得了厘米级的相对定位精度。

    Abstract:

    Aiming at the problem that when pseudorange observation noise was high, and the ambiguity calculation of TCAR(three carrier ambiguity resolution) method was unreliable in the condition of kinematic-to-kinematic, a triple-frequency kinematic-to-kinematic ambiguity resolution with BDS/INS tightly-coupled integration was proposed. Replacing the double-difference pseudorange observations in GF(geometry-free) and GB(geometry-based) patterns with the double-difference geometry distances estimated by the tightly-coupled integration system, the method obviously decreased the noise level of the pseudorange double-difference observations and improved the success rate of triple-frequency ambiguity calculation. Simulation results show that, the high-precision position output of BDS/INS tightly-coupled integration improved the accuracy of pseudorange observations by more than 60%. In short-baseline condition, when the pseudorange observation noise is 2 m, the success rate of triple-frequency integer ambiguity calculation by GF-TCAR is 0.73% while 31.25% by GB-TCAR. However, the integer ambiguity calculation success rate by the new TCAR method is beyond 99%. And this new solution can achieve centimeter-level kinematic-to-kinematic relative positioning.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵修斌,朱楚江,庞春雷,等. BDS/INS紧组合三频动对动模糊度解算方法[J].国防科技大学学报,2020,42(6):127-132.
ZHAO Xiubin, ZHU Chujiang, PANG Chunlei, et al. Triple-frequency kinematic-to-kinematic ambiguity resolution with BDS/INS tightly-coupled integration[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology,2020,42(6):127-132.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-02
  • 出版日期: 2020-12-28
文章二维码