引用本文: | 谢红卫,孙志强,李欣欣,等.典型人因可靠性分析方法评述[J].国防科技大学学报,2007,29(2):101-107.[点击复制] |
XIE Hongwei,SUN Zhiqiang,LI Xinxin,et al.An Overview of Typical Methods for Human Reliability Analysis[J].Journal of National University of Defense Technology,2007,29(2):101-107[点击复制] |
|
|
|
本文已被:浏览 6736次 下载 6264次 |
典型人因可靠性分析方法评述 |
谢红卫, 孙志强, 李欣欣, 李政仪, 张明, 史秀建, 李龙 |
(国防科技大学 机电工程与自动化学院,湖南 长沙 410073)
|
摘要: |
对比较典型的第一代和第二代人因可靠性分析方法进行综述。首先讨论人因可靠性的基本定义;然后选取几种比较有代表意义的第一代方法进行对比分析,以此为基础介绍第一代方法的基本思想和特征;接下来分析第二代人因可靠性分析方法中两种典型方法,讨论它们的基本特点,并分析它们相对于第一代人因可靠性分析方法的优势以及自身的一些问题;最后展望人因可靠性分析方法的发展趋势。 |
关键词: 人因可靠性分析 HRA方法 性能形成因子 认知模型 事件树 |
DOI: |
投稿日期:2006-11-06 |
基金项目:国家部委基金资助项目(51404010105KG0121);国家部委资助项目(51319040201) |
|
An Overview of Typical Methods for Human Reliability Analysis |
XIE Hongwei, SUN Zhiqiang, LI Xinxin, LI Zhengyi, ZHANG Ming, SHI Xiujian, LI Long |
(College of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073,China)
|
Abstract: |
Some typical methods for human reliability analysis are surveyed. Firstly, the definition of human reliability is discussed. Secondly, several typical methods are chosen from the first generation methods for comparison and review. Their basic characters and limitations are discussed. Thirdly, two typical methods of the second generation are analyzed in detail. The comparison between the above and the preceding methods is carried out while their advantages and drawbacks are presented. Finally, further research suggestion is proposed. |
Keywords: Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) HRA method Performance Shaping Factor (PSF) cognitive model event tree |
|
|